Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:33:30 +0200 [ (text/plain, inline)] severity 670040 normal stop On 22.04.12 Juhapekka Tolvanen (juhtolv@iki.fi) wrote: Hi, > Package: texlive-latex-extra > Version: 202-1 > Severity: grave > This is overdone. Just b/c you found a single program in texlive-latex-extra not working, doesn't mean it is completely useless.

The wide blade or the third prong are provided for your safety. Security regulations as stated in the EN 60065 (VDE 0860 / IEC 65) and the. The Wheelie Bin symbol found on the product or in the manual indicates that. PLIFIER power amps combine uncompromising audio. PARALLEL regeln die Eingangspegel.

>% java -jar /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/pax/pax.jar kilinorganisaatio.pdf > Exception in thread 'main' java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/pdfbox/cos/ICOSVisitor > AFAICT the problem in the moment is: the pdfbox package in Debian unstable delivers a too recent pdfbox lib, pax is not able to use it. Please read (I'm pretty sure it is packaged in Debian). Kodi oshibok bmv h5 e70 2017. Does this help you? -- sigmentation fault [ (application/pgp-signature, inline)]. Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:23:57 +0200 Hi Norbert, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:05:32AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > we got a bug report in Debian that pax does not work, and the > reason is that pdfbox is much newer in Debian, namely 1.6.0 from > Apache: > > On So, 22 Apr 2012, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > (I'm > > Interesting. Pdfbox in Debian is the one from apache > > while pax uses the one from > pdfbox.org > which is an empty wordpress, and one download. I don't know what the > history of that is, maybe pdfbox was later taken over into apache > and further developped.

> > I am quite sure that the pdfbox from pdfbox.org will not be > packaged in Debian. > > Heiko, do you see any problem in porting your pax to the recent > pdfbox by apache? Pax works with pdfbox 0.7.2 or 0.7.3.

The download page for pdfbox contains a section 'Download old releases' and a link to the old sourceforge page: There both 0.7.2 or 0.7.3 can be downloaded. Currently I don't have time to update pax to the new pdfbox. TL freeze is nearing and my bundle update is more important to me. At least the update of README is on the way to CTAN. Yours sincerely Heiko Oberdiek. Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:32:28 +0100 [ (text/plain, inline)] On 23.04.12 Heiko Oberdiek (heiko.oberdiek@googlemail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:05:32AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Dear Heiko,, > > we got a bug report in Debian that pax does not work, and the > > reason is that pdfbox is much newer in Debian, namely 1.6.0 from > > Apache: > > > Currently I don't have time to update pax to the new pdfbox. Artcam dongle crack.

> TL freeze is nearing and my bundle update is more important to me. > At least the update of README is on the way to CTAN. > Any chance to have pax/pdfannotextractor working w/ recent pdfbox in the future? Regards, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault [ (application/pgp-signature, inline)].

Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:44:26 +0200 [ (text/plain, inline)] Hi, Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that pdfannotextractor does work fine provided that: 1 - one runs pdfannotextractor --install once (which downloads pdfbox 0.7.3 and saves it to ~/.texliveYYYY/., so that it can be used later on). 2 - one does not have the libpdfbox-java package installed, because in this situation the package from /usr/share/java/pdfbox.jar takes priority.

For example we see: localhost ~ $ pdfannotextractor --install PDFAnnotExtractor 0.1l, 2012/04/18 - Copyright (c) 2008, 2011, 2012 by Heiko Oberdiek. * Nothing to do, because PDFBox is already found: /usr/share/java/pdfbox.jar IMO, the latter can be considered a problem, because it leads to the error message encountered by the reporter. In a sense, the libpdfbox-java package (which is pulled, e.g., by jabref) conflicts with that functionality of texlive-latex-extra. I suggest to amend the perl script /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/pax/pdfannotextractor.pl so that it deliberately skips a jar file which happens to *not* contain the class org/pdfbox/cos/ICOSVisitor.class, as a hint that we're probably talking to a newer pdfbox version which pdfannotextractor doesn't grok yet. This is essentially what the attached patch does.

[ (text/x-diff, attachment)].